Renault F1 collapsing, Briatore and Symonds resign

Incredible news that Renault is not disputing the charges of intentionally wrecking Piquet. Flavio Briatore and chief engineer Pat Symonds have resigned their posts.

It appears that Renault knows they are busted and are doing what they can to lessen the huge penalties that are coming. It still is not clear exactly what the piece of incontrivertible evidence is, but it must be out there.

Planet-F1 posted a full transcript of Renault’s radio communication up through the point of Piquet’s crash. There’s nothing here that directly implicates them. Nor should we expect that to be the case. Certainly, Renault would not be foolish enough to say anything overt over the radio. It would be worked out ahead of time with Piquet. At the most, there would be some kind of coded signal over the radio to Piquet to tell him when to wreck. But not necessarily even that, he could know exactly which lap to wreck it and Renault works their plan around that. With that in mind, it’s interesting when reading the transcripts, how eager Symonds is to pit Alonso early. He can’t be talked out of it. If you read between the lines in the transcript, you can start to form a picture, but it’s far from a ‘smoking gun’.

Now that it appears that almost certainly, Renault is guilty, it raises a couple of questions:

1) Why, Renault, why? – It seems incredibly foolish on the surface that Renault would attempt such a thing, given the enormous downside if they were caught, and for what? A race win? Yes, any race victory is quite a big deal, but Renault was not in the running for any kind of championship. It doesn’t feel like enough to risk the whole organization for. But, Renault F1 was struggling badly at the time, and it’s possible they decided that they desperately needed a result, in order to retain support and keep the team afloat. I could buy that.

2) then you kick Piquet to the curb? Huh? – This is the one I can’t wrap my head around. Asking him to crash intentionally to effectively ‘fix’ a race result, you’ve handed Nelson Piquet a time bomb that he can detonate at any time to blow up your whole organization. With that in mind, why would you treat him so horribly, bad mouthing him and throw him off the team in the middle of the next season? Yes, his results were not there, but I still cannot imagine dumping him so unceremoniously, given what transpired at Singapore. Surely you owe him at least another season, asking him to do something that risks himself so, both his safety and his professional reputation. And getting on his bad side like this, well, now we have seen the obvious result. What gives?

NASCAR Coke Zero 400 – some observations

• • • First of all, I’m amazed as I bump around the Interwebs that there are a few people out there, saying in total sincerity that Tony Stewart wrecked Kyle Busch, usually accompanied by some sentiment to the effect of how Busch ‘had it coming’. Are people BLIND? It was one of the clearest cases I’ve ever seen of a block gone wrong. Busch drove directly into the path of Stewart who could have done nothing to avoid the impact. Busch wrecked himself, plain and simple. Stewart had no hand in it whatsoever.

 

• • • But, really, if you ask me what was the cause of the wreck, it wasn’t Stewart, it wasn’t Busch, it was RESTRICTOR PLATE RACING. With the current aerodynamics of the cars combined with the restrictor plates, a lead car has absolutely no defense when the car behind him ‘gets a run’. So the leader makes a desperate block (sometimes 2 or 3). Blocking is a dirty move. Throwing yourself in front of a faster car who is about to pass you, hoping that he slams on the brakes because he has the good sense not to cause an accident, is not racing. But the drivers’ hands are forced. The drivers will continue to block, and when a wreck happens, there will be 20+ cars ready to pile into the wrecked cars because the grid is so tightened up. NASCAR could conceivably implement an anti-blocking rule, but that would he hard to enforce and just make plate races even more of a game of musical chairs than they are now. The answer is to GET RID OF THE PLATES!!!!

 

• • • I was very relieved to see Kyle hop out of the car, seemingly ok (though he did complain of a headache). He took several horrendous impacts. There was a lot of groaning and wincing in the room as we watched the replays. It is indeed a credit to the safety of the cars. But one of these times, we won’t be so lucky… this madness doesn’t have to happen.

 

• • • But what do I know, I’m just watching on TV right? Let’s ask, oh I don’t know.. how about Tony Stewart? The guy who won the race. He just won his second race as a driver/owner, at DAYTONA of all places, and here he is in victory lane. Wait, why isn’t he happy? He should be on top of the world right now. He’s not happy because a fellow competitor and friend of his was savagely wrecked, and it is not satisfying for him as a competitor to win like that, and for Kyle to run so well and not finish. And he can’t point to a foolish, or overzealous move on his part or Kyle’s part, it was just the reality of restrictor plate racing. Could this downer of a victory lane interview be an eye-opener to Brian France? Can it help him see that maybe, something is very wrong here? Not likely…

 

• • • Speaking of the victory lane interview, what about this “Miss Sprint”? Here we have Tony Stewart giving an interview, clearly upset about what just happened, and Miss Sprint is the only other person on the screen and she just couldn’t be happier about the situation. Congratulations, Sprint, you just made Miss Sprint look like an idiot. Now, I’m not criticizing the woman at all. She’s paid to stand in the camera shot and grin from ear to ear. The point is, is it really necessary to have a woman in a Sprint getup just standing there doing nothing but smiling throughout this whole interview? The fact that smiling is her only role is what made her look foolish. If you want Miss Sprint to be a part of the celebration, why can’t she present the check, or the trophy, or she can hand the winner a drink and walk away, I don’t know. The blatant insertion of her as a ‘presence’ in the entirety of these interviews (we can’t even see the interviewER) just reeks of desperate over-commercialization, in what is already the most whored out sport on television.

So.. OK, if the prospect of our TV screens not being filled with a logo for a few seconds is too terrible to even consider, (sacrilege!!) how about a nice big foam Sprint cell phone that sits on top of the winner’s car? Have they done something like that before? Maybe NEXTEL did. I like that a lot better. Remember the big foam PowerAde bottles? Sometimes the saga of the PowerAde bottles in victory lane was more compelling than the race itself. That sounds better than Miss Sprint’s current role. (Not that I want Miss Sprint to lose her job. I’m pretty sure she has many other capacities as Miss Sprint anyway.)

 

• • • Watching the replays, you have to wonder. What if Kyle didn’t make that final desperate block? It’s possible he didn’t need to. Yes, Tony was passing him, but they were awful close to the line. I think there’s a chance Kyle could’ve held him off. Would Kyle have thought differently if he wasn’t ‘mirror racing’?

 

• • • The ‘Wide Open Coverage’ by TNT was, all in all, pretty damn nice. I think advertisers aren’t used to dealing with more than 30 seconds for their spots. Some of those elongated commercials were weak and could’ve EASILY been condensed to 30 seconds and not lost anything at all. I didn’t like that Ralph Sheheen had to ‘set up’ the commercials. Between that, and all the usual sponsored segments (Toyota updates and what not), Sheheen had to do an awful lot of shilling. But it’s awesome to be able to see all the green flag action. And how is it not a win for the advertisers too? I’m sure I could name almost all of the advertisers that bought an ‘inset’ commercial during the race. You would think a network could command a lot more money for ads like this. Let’s hope this catches on with other networks..

 

• • • I can’t find much too fault with TNT’s coverage. Aside from all the shilling, the commentary was top notch (no Bill Weber, good! Dallenbach and Petty, great!). Good information throughout. Good camera work. One slip up, and this one can’t be forgiven, is to not update the conditions of the drivers after the big wreck at the end. ESPN does the same regularly when they do their races. But ESPN sucks at everything. I wish TNT had more dates. They are really showing how it’s done.

 

• • • I’m really impressed with Juan Pablo Montoya this season. His talent is unquestionable. He’s one of the best drivers in the world. The question was whether he could adapt to stock car racing. The answer seems to be, absolutely yes! On an underperforming Ganassi team, he continued his excellent season today despite a lot of adversity, solidifying a top 12 points standing in a group mostly populated by the Hendrick and Roush superteams. Give him another year or two experience, put him on a top team, and he’s got championship written all over him.

2009 Aeroflot Open – Mamedyarov withdraws

The Aeroflot Open, not content with being overshadowed by the Topalov/Kamsky match and Linares, has produced a major development. In Round 6, Mamedyarov with white got squashed by a Russian GM named Igor Kurnosov (2602 rated) in 21 moves. Apparently Kurnosov was leaving the board after every move. Mamedyarov got upset, withdrew from the tournament, and circulated a letter that indicated a suspicion of Kurnosov cheating with Rybka in the ‘toilet’.

in Kurnosov’s defense:
-He was searched by the arbiter, who found nothing but a lighter, cigarettes, and a pen on his person.
-There were only a handful of moves past theory; while his choices mostly matched Rybka, this is hardly exceptional for a GM to match Rybka on 5-6 moves.
-It was reported that Kurnosov was not visiting the toilet, but instead was simply retreating to a smoking area, where he was always in plain sight.

Mamedyarov has handled this quite badly, in my opinion. There are ways to deal with an opponent you suspect has cheated, and this can’t be the best way. His withdrawing has made the whole situation into a public spectacle, making himself look bad (for withdrawing with rather weak evidence of cheating), and putting a huge spotlight on Kurnosov. If Mamedyarov was mistaken, and Kurnosov wasn’t cheating, it’s a terrible thing to do to the guy. His accomplishments will be questioned and any moves he makes will be scrutinized. How can he be comfortable? In the first six rounds, Kurnosov was +4-0=2. After the cheating accusation, he’s had a 12-move draw and a 44-move loss. It certainly makes you wonder how his mindset is right now.

I think Mamedyarov has not done himself any favors for his career here. He may lose out on future invites to tournaments after this rash and potentially damaging decision.

Conspiracy theorists may want to take a look at a previous game from the tournament, Onischuk vs. Kurnosov (0-1). Kurnosov demonstrates a rather remarkable tactical vision in this game, winning with a combination that I dare say looks a little computer-like. However, I am merely a club player and thus am in no way qualified to say what a GM is or isn’t capable of. But, I am confident in saying it’s a more impressive display than his victory over Mamedyarov (which I think would never be suspicious if not for his behavior in leaving the board).

It doesn’t appear that the toilet problems are going away anytime soon. With chess engines now much stronger than humans, and a myriad of ways for players to use an engine themselves, or communicate with someone who is using one, it seems that toilet trips will always be viewed with suspicion. Cheating accusations are unquestionably bad for the game, whether they are founded in truth or not.

So why not start using clear plexiglass bathrooms, similar to the ‘box’ used in the Bilbao tournament? Players would have no way of cheating in the toilet without being spotted, and there would be increased spectator interest with the added draw of being able to watch the players relieve themselves. Yeah, I don’t know why I’m not in charge either.

Chess overload

It’s chess overload this week. I don’t remember this ever happening before, where three huge events are all starting up at the same time.

Feb. 17-27: Topalov vs. Kamsky candidates match
Topalov is the clear favorite, having regained the world #1 rating, and showing fantastic results lately. Kamsky is trailing Topalov by a good 80 points and has not really distinguished himself as a serious world championship contender since his 2007 World Cup victory. However, he has a reputation as a very strong match player. Also, this is merely an 8-game match, and the match can turn on just one win, so Kamsky is a live dog here..
Feb. 16-27: Aeroflot Open
Aeroflot is generally the strongest open tournament of the year. The winner gets an automatic invite into 2009 Dortmund supertournament.
Feb. 18-Mar. 8: Linares
Linares is arguably the most respected and prestigious of the annual ‘supertournaments’. This year’s field includes the World Champion Viswanathan Anand, along with Ivanchuk, Carlsen, Aronian, Radjabov, Grischuk, Yue, and Dominguez-Perez.

 

I don’t know if it’s a good thing that all these events are compressed together. With everything going on at once, it will be hard to give all these games their due attention. Also, there are so many dry spells during the year where there are no major events, I think I’d like to see things spread out some! But, what can you do? It will be a fun couple of weeks!

How NASCAR is killing their own sport

Now that the season is starting up, NASCAR is on the mind, so I’m going to air my grievances.  I’ve been watching NASCAR since the mid-80s and I feel like the sport is getting farther and farther away from the one I originally fell in love with.  A number of disturbing changes have taken effect, mostly under the Brian France regime, since the sport has gone more “corporate”.  While getting the sport on network TV was undoubtedly a good thing, I feel the sport is in trouble if various trends continue.  The common thread with most of what I’m going to outline is the sacrificing of the integrity of the sport, and thus its long-term health, in return for short-term money gains.  You’ll see nothing groundbreaking here; I’m sure all of it has been discussed before.  This is just my perspective on everything.

 

 

Restrictor Plates
The use of restrictor plates at Daytona and Talledega was a panic decision made after Bobby Allison’s became completely airborne and flew into the fence at Talledega in 1987.  20 years later and apparently NASCAR still hasn’t figured out a better way , despite the fact that restrictor plates arguably make the races even more dangerous, and turn four of the season’s most popular events into parades rather than races.   The cars now have roof flaps which prevents cars from randomly going airborne.  Maybe the cars are too fast to run full-out at Talladega/Daytona, but there has to be a better way to slow the cars down.   A cynic might take the point of view that NASCAR likes the fact that cars are so bunched up that there are 8,700 lead changes in a race, and 37th place is 1.4 seconds behind the leader, so they choose to ignore how dangerous it is to have the cars running in such close quarters.   Me, I don’t like the danger, and I don’t like the affect it has on the race.  These races are more exercises in drafting than they are anything else.  The fastest guy doesn’t necessarily win.  It’s more about whoever had the right drafting circumstances at the right time.  I won’t deny that there’s some skill in it, but it barely qualifies as ‘racing’.

It seems that incidents like Carl Edwards in 2008 making a joke out of the race by intentionally running in the back of the field doesn’t get NASCAR’s attention.   20-car pileups every year don’t get their attention.  What will it take?  I’d like to see another legitimate Daytona 500 in my lifetime.

 

Points System
Here is a rare example of NASCAR NOT being overly reactive.   The points system in  place right is a relic from old times where NASCAR needed to encourage participation in all the races.  Put simply, it rewards finishing the race, more so than it rewards high finishes.  A much better points system would be an F1-style, but with more places paid due to the larger field.  Give points to the top 20, 24, something like that.  And the guys finishing near the bottom of the points should be getting a pittance compared to the top 5 guys.  When a driver wins a race in F1, it has BIG implications in the points!  Always!  Not so in NASCAR.  Let’s fix it.

It’s not so terrible that the best driver doesn’t win the championship _most_ of the time, (but how about this: does anybody think Bowyer was the third best performer in 2007?) but the system as it is still causes some problems and simply doesn’t encourage hard racing.  Also, the huge emphasis on finishing spawns other problems.  Cars that get wrecked will often get patched up by the crew and get sent out to limp around the inside of the track at 80 MPH with a carcass of a car spewing debris all over the track.  This is rather dangerous for the remaining drivers on the track, besides just being a nuisance and causing unncessary caution flags.   It also is rather insulting to limp around the track clearly with no intention of actually racing, and in no way really demonstrating any more deservedness of points than the guy who got in the same wreck and is sitting in the garage.

This points system also, when used in conjunction with the ‘top 35 rule’, creates the vicious circle where a guy on the bubble of the top 35 missing one race gets knocked way back in the points and will likely continue to miss many more races.   Missing a race should not have such devastating consequences; at least, you shouldn’t lose huge ground to some guy who finished 4 laps down in 26th place.

 

Passing
You hear these phrases on NASCAR broadcasts all the time.  “big picture”.  “track position is everything”.  “clean air/dirty air”.   These are spoken with reverent tones by the commentators as if they represent the finer points of NASCAR strategy.  In reality, they all mean the same thing – you ain’t seein’ any passing today.  At the end of the race, drivers are usually a little more blunt about the situation – “it’s so hard to pass out there”.  I’ve heard this phrase uttered at almost every track at one time or another, and I don’t remember hearing it at all in the 80s.   Part of the problem is the new “cookie cutter” single-groove tracks that are taking over the circuit, but that’s not the whole of it.   The aerodynamics of these cars are just not right.   I don’t want to hear about dirty air all day.  If a guy is faster than the guy in front of him, he should be able to pass him evetually.

 

Caution Flags.. wtf?
All too many times in the last 5-10 years, the seasoned NASCAR fan has had to watch with a suspicious eye as NASCAR throws a caution for ‘debris’ on the track that nobody can seem to find.  Usually the timing is such that it benefits one of NASCAR’s pet drivers who needs a caution to make repairs, or to tighten up a race where the field is so strung out that nothing is happening.  It seems to happen several times a year.   It’s a pro wrestling kind of vibe.  The reality of sports is that the game is sometimes a blowout.  You have just learn to live with it if you’re running a legitimate sport, and not an exhibition.

And while  on the subject, when there’s a ‘debris’ caution  where just one little scrap of metal needs to be picked up, why do the cars have to needlessly stay under caution for 4-5+ laps?  These races are already absurdly long; they don’t need to be made even longer with overwrought caution periods.

 

Lucky DOG
Remember how exciting it was when a driver with a good car got caught a lap down and had to desperately fight the leaders to stay ahead and get his lap back?  Well, NASCAR decided we don’t need to have any excitement like that.   Now, you just have to be the highest placed car out of the bunch that is a lap down.   So, if you screw up and go a lap down, it doesn’t really  matter now, as long as it’s early enough in the race.  This is a horrible rule.   There was nobody calling for it.  The only conceivable reason for its existence is that NASCAR wants to see their star drivers winning more races, so they give them ‘mulligans’ during the race.  And apparently, it’s not even enough to give out lucky dogs to drivers that are one lap down.  If no cars are exactly one lap down, then the next highest driver that is 2+ laps down gets a free lap.  Kyle Busch once went five laps down at Watkins Glen, got 5 lucky dogs and ended up finishing 9th.  That is a JOKE.

 

Qualifying – top 35
How do you needlessly handicap new Sprint Cup teams and make qualifying into a joke of an event?  Just implement a “Top 35″ rule of course.   Once again this rule was an incredible overreaction by NASCAR when they didn’t like the fact that a couple guys that they wanted in all the races weren’t making all the races.   They were around 30ish in the point, so… top 35 rule!   The funny thing is that the rule has had the opposite effect, as brand new teams/drivers, along with veteran drivers switching to new teams, have been absolutely brutalized by the top 35 rule, most notably Michael Waltrip in 2007 whose debut season driving for his own team was absolutely ruined. He missed several races.  The situations this rule causes is far worse than anything that was happening before it.

Here’s how I see it:   If you absolutely must have your ‘boys’ locked into every race, then go all the way with it.  Decide who all your teams are at the beginning of the season, and that’s it.  That’s your field for every race.  If you want to continue it old school, and let anybody who shows up on any given week try and make the race, don’t half-ass it.  Give them a fair shot at qualifying!   If somebody doesn’t make it because they’re too slow, well that’s what qualifying is all about, isn’t it?

 

Sponsorships – official X of nascar
In a sport so heavily relies on corporate sponsorships to enable their teams to field cars, why would you alienate so many potential sponsors by naming ‘the official phone/home improvement warehouse/tools/dishwasher/shoe polish/etc. etc of NASCAR’?   Well, OK, I know the answer, but again, have some concern for the well-being of your sport before selling out to anyone and everyone.

 

Too many races
36 races!!   Why!!??  And that’s not even including the Shootout and the All-Star Race.  This is the most interminable season in all of sports.  These poor drivers and teams, 38+ weeks out of the year must participate in the race, multiple practices, qualifying, car preparations, along with media/promotional obligations.  In other words, they’re never home.  Was 30 races not cutting it?  Really, you could argue even 30 was excessive.

So OK, I’m not one of the drivers, and I watch NASCAR, so why should I complain about seeing more races?   Well, for one, when you have a race almost every week of the year, the races seem less special.  Daytona, the Brickard, the 600, I can get amped up for.   But the endless cookie-cutter races on the Kansases/Californias/Chicagos of the world, I could do without some of them.  I like a race when it feels like a big event.   Watching 36 races is a real test of your NASCAR fandom; I don’t care who you are.

But what really sucks is fan favorites like Rusty Wallace, Bill Elliott, Ricky Rudd, Dale Jarrett, and Mark Martin retiring (or going to part-time schedules) too soon because they are run ragged by the grind.  Some of these guys were still driving at a very high level.  Martin clearly gave up prime opportunities for a championship when he went to part-time.  Elliott, if not for a flat tire at Homestead, would’ve won his final two races as a full-time driver.  Rusty was still one of the best on the track when he quit as well.

 

Chase
I don’t like “The Chase” much, but hey, at least it was an honest, well-thought-out attempt at implementing a playoff system for NASCAR, right?  Well, sort of.   More than anything, it was a panic decision by NASCAR in reaction to drivers locking up the championship before the final race, and Matt Kenseth doing so in 2003 was the final straw.  So basically, NASCAR didn’t like potentially sagging ratings for the final 2 or 3 races, so they decided to implement a points system that makes the first 26 races rather silly.  Hmm.

An essay on the Chase and its faults probably needs to be its own blog entry.   Suffice to say for now, the idea of playoffs just doesn’t really fit with this sport.  As far I can tell, it hasn’t really generated higher TV ratings or attendance.   It’s my feeling, from what I’ve read over the years in numerous online NASCAR discussion forums, that more fans dislike it than the fans that like it.  I could be wrong on that.

 

Adding drivers to chase, shootout, etc
Is there anybody who didn’t audibly groan when NASCAR expanded the chase from 10 to 12 drivers the year after Earnhardt and Stewart didn’t make the Chase in consecutive years?  Totally transparent.  Keep making moves like this and we start to shift from legitmate sport to pro wrestling.

Taking 12 drivers doesn’t really producce an impressive selection of drivers, when you consider that only 20 or so teams could really be considered competitive.  NASCAR Is lucky that a guy like Bowyer didn’t win the championship in ’07 to expose this silliness of taking 12 drivers. (sorry to keep picking on you Clint, it’s just that the Chase has been VERY kind to you)

NASCAR was back up to their old tricks this year, expanding the Shootout field to _28_ drivers, so they could find a way to get Stewart in.  How’s that for an elite field?  28 drivers!  Every single Dodge full-time driver was in the race.

 

Green white checker
OK, this would be way down near the bottom of the list of problems if I tried to actually rank them, but I still have a beef with the green/white/checker rule.  It’s more contrived, forced excitement from NASCAR instead of something real.  When a race ends under caution, fans are not deprived of a green flag finish.   If the caution came out on lap 197, then there, your green flag finish was on lap 197.   But the real problem with this is that tacking extra laps on to the end of the race messes with fuel mileage.   If a driver is trying to stretch out a tank of fuel and suddenly has to run several extra laps because of a green/white/checker, that’s not fair.

 

I could go on with more maladies: the common template concept, along with the COT, the shaky inconsistency in regards to administering penalties (admittely many sports have a problem with this), the influence of ISC, but this is too long already and too depressing!

Grammar epidemic sweeping the Internet

Most cases of bad grammar and bad spelling don’t really bother me, but for some reason there are certain things that get under my skin. There’s one that seems to get more prominent every day. I’m not sure where it came from but I’m seeing it all over the place. I saw one of the worst examples today:

RELAX AND ENJOY YOURSELVE’S, MY FRIEND’S

WHY?? WHY would you think that every plural takes an apostrophe + s? How is this happening? The apostrophe is.. such a simple thing, no?